Kebebasan Beragama dan Kontroversi Hijab : Sebuah Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59342/jl.v2i1.175Keywords:
Freedom of religion, headscarf, Women's rights, Islam, International lawAbstract
This article investigates the position of international human rights law with respect to the Hijab (veil) worn by Muslim women to express their religious beliefs. In Islam, the hijab is not only an important aspect of a woman's faith, but also shows their religious affiliation as a form of submission to God. However, the regulation of headscarves in several countries has raised complex human rights issues, particularly in the context of women's rights to freedom of religion and its manifestations, equality and non-discrimination. This article examines the theological status of the hijab in Islam for the first time. In the West, the ban on wearing the headscarf has increased discrimination against Muslim women and restricted the movement of Muslim women as they are forced to withdraw from public life and remain at home. Secondly, it analyzes the selected laws, administrative acts, and cases regarding the wearing of the hijab in public places, especially in European Union (EU) countries. The article concluded that there was no justification under international human rights law for banning Muslim women from wearing the headscarf. The absence of a reasonable justification in accordance with human rights law can interfere with individual freedom to practice a religion. The general exclusion of women from work or other life activities due to the use of the headscarf will lead to further discrimination. The article concluded that there was no justification under international human rights law for banning Muslim women from wearing the headscarf. The absence of a reasonable justification in accordance with human rights law can interfere with individual freedom to practice a religion. The general exclusion of women from work or other life activities due to the use of the headscarf will lead to further discrimination. The article concluded that there was no justification under international human rights law for banning Muslim women from wearing the headscarf. The absence of a reasonable justification in accordance with human rights law can interfere with individual freedom to practice a religion. The general exclusion of women from work or other life activities due to the use of the headscarf will lead to further discrimination.
References
MA, LLB,LLM(LucknowASuniversitas, India); LLM (StrathclydeASuniversitas, Inggris Raya); LLD(Meerut Universitas,India). Profesor Hukum, Universiti Islam Sultan Sharif Ali (UNISSA), Brunei. Surel:ahmadnehal@yahoo.com.** LLB (IIUM); LLM, PhD (Inggris). Wakil Dekan, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, Universiti Islam Sultan Sharif Ali (UNISSA), Brunei. Surel:hanan.aziz@unissa.edu.bn.
LLB &Sarjana Syariah (BSL), LLM, UNISSA, Brunei, PhD (kandidat) Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, Universiti Islam Sultan Sharif Ali, Brunei. Surel:20po2003@siswi.unissa.edu.bn.
Dia ketentuan Jilbab adalah digunakan di dalam ini artikel sebagai AGumum paying ketentuan keRefer ke itudressingHaiF A Muslim wanitayang dia yakini sesuai dengan keyakinan agamanya dan membuatnya terlihat dapat diidentifikasi sebagai Muslim.
SaraSlininger, 'Wanita Bercadar: Hijab, Agama dan Praktik Budaya' (2014) Historia 73. CyrilGlasse, The New Encyclopedia of Islam (Altamira Press 2001) 179-180.
Nisar Mohammad di dalam Ahmad,'Itu Islam Dan Internasional Manusia HakLaw PerspektifHaiF Jilbab:Kasus Eropa '(2011) 2 (16) Jurnal Internasional Bisnis dan Ilmu Sosial 161-172.
Fatimah Osman, 'Legislatif LaranganHaiN Memakai A Jilbab: Adalah Mereka Dibenarkan?' (2014)17(4) AfrikaJurnal Online 1320.
Muhammad Saed Abdul-Rahman, TafsirIbN Kathir Bagian18HaiF30: Al Muminum001 Ke Al Furqan020 (MSAPublikasi Terbatas 2012) 98.
SayyidQutb, Dalam Naungan Al Quran: Surah 21-25, (Adil Salahi (tr), XII, Yayasan Islam) 243.
Jim AC Everett, et. Al.,'Tertutupi di dalam stigma? Itu dampak dari berbeda tingkat dari Islam penutup kepala pada eksplisitdan bias implisit terhadap perempuan Muslim' (2015) 45 Journal of Applied Social Psychology 102.
Asifa Siraj,'ArtiHaiFModesty Dan itu Jilbab diantara Muslim Wanita di dalam Glasgow, Skotlandia'(2011)18(6) Gender, Tempat & Budaya - Jurnal Geografi Feminis 718.
Murtadha Gusau,'Itu Menghadapi Kerudung(Niqab) adalahTIDAKTobmengikatdi dalamIslam' PremiumTkali <https://opinion.premiumtimesng.com/2018/03/09/the-face-veil-niqab is-not-obligatory-in-islam-by-murtadha-gusau/> diakses 29 Maret 2022.
'Adalah itu menghadapiayeilFatau wanitaobmengikat?'(24 Juni 2019) keislaman diakses14 Maret 2022.
Sahih Muslim,vol. 2, hadits no. 1926.
Artikel 2, Universal Pernyataan dari ManusiaRpenerbangan (diadopsi 10 Desember 1948 UNGARes 217 A(III) (UDHR) 19 PernyataanHaiNTDiaepembatasanHaiF Semua FormulirHaiFInttoleransi Dan Diskriminasi Berdasarkan pada AgamaHaiR Kepercayaan(diadopsi 25 November 1981) A/RES/36/55. internasional Perjanjian HaiN Ekonomis, Sosial Dan KulturalRpenerbangan,Haipened untuk tanda tangan pada 16 Desember1966S. Perjanjian Dok. No.95-19, 993 UNTS 3.Itu Konvensi HaiN itu EliminasiHaiF Semua FormulirHaiF Diskriminasi melawan Wanita (CEDAW),18 Desember1979, UNTS 1249.
Internasional Kovenan Hak Ekonomi, Sosial dan Budaya (ICESCR), 16 Desember 1966, UNTS 993.23 kulitŠeta,'TerlupakanWopria: Itu Dampak dari Islamofobia pada Muslim Wanita' (2016) Eropa JaringanMelawan Rasisme 16.
T.F. Ruby, 'Mendengarkan Suara Hijab' (2006) 29 (1) WanitaForum Studi Internasional56.
Staf Meja,'TDia Rasa manis dari Jilbab (kerudung): A Bersifat ketuhanan Inspirasi'(3 Desember 2019)TDia IslamInformasi SemuaTentang Islamdiakses 29 Agustus 2021.
Kumar & Sharon Siddique,Jaditimur laut Asia: Itu Keberagaman Dilema: Bagaimana intra regional kontradiksi Dankekuatan eksternal membentuk Asia Tenggara saat ini(PilihPenerbitan 2008) 32.
Aymen Ati,'Itu Pasca-9/11 SekuritisasiHaiF itu Jilbab Daninternasional Manusia HakLaw: itu StrasbourgPengadilan, Pasal 9 dan QMHRR Pembatasan Hijab (2019) 5 (1) 6.
LeylaSahin vs Turki, Eropa Pengadilan dariHak Asasi Manusia, Kamar, Bagian Keempat, Permohonan No. 44774/98, Putusan 26 Juni 2004 [92].
Perjanjianpada Cjahat Dan PolitikRpenerbangan, UmumCpertanda TIDAK 22: Artikel 18 (Kebebasan dari Pikiran,Conscienceatau Agama) CCPR/C/21/Rev1/Add4 (1993) [4].
Shahreen Tikar Nayan, 'PenutupkamuPdan Berbicara! Analisis Retorika Narasi Hijabi' (2017) 2 (1) Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS) 40-52.
Ada Perkins, 'Pembukaan Muslim Wanita: Itu KonstitusionalitasHaiF Jilbab Batasan di dalam Turki,Tunisiadan Kosovo' (2021) 30 Jurnal Hukum Internasional Universitas Boston 541.
Ayelet Shachar, 'Agama, Negara, Dan itu MasalahHaiF Jenis kelamin: Membayangkan Ulang Kewarganegaraan Dan PemerintahanNDiverse Societies '(2005) 50 Jurnal Hukum McGill 81.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Landraad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.